ChiroACCESS Clinical Review



Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Diagnosis

This information is provided to you for use in conjunction with your clinical judgment and the specific needs of the patient.

Lead Author(s): 

Dwain M. Daniel, D.C.

  

How this evidence was rated:

Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT)



Published on

January 14, 2008

Text Size:     
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is an exclusion diagnosis. Approximately 20% of scoliosis patients have an identifiable cause such as hemi-vertebrae, but 80% remain without known cause. Only after all causes can be ruled out can the diagnosis of AIS be appropriately made.

There is significant controversy relating to school screening programs used to identify students with scoliosis. Concern has been voiced that the programs are costly and refer far too many children for follow-up and possible treatment. The argument is made that AIS is a relatively rare condition, early detection does not alter the natural history and radiographic examination to monitor for progression of the curve poses a health risk to young girls. The United States Preventive Services Task force stated ”there is insufficient evidence for or against routine screening of asymptomatic adolescents for idiopathic scoliosis” (1). Others suggest the referral criteria should be tightened in order to refer fewer children (2). Still others argue that early intervention can be of benefit and screening is justified (3). An example of one school system’s screening program, which required 448 students be screened for each student treated, follows (4):

Children in screening program:   2242
Referred to physician:   92
Received scoliosis diagnosis:   27
Curves greater than 20°:   16
Number treated:   5
Surgical treatment:   2

AttentionIn order to view the full content of this review, which includes information broken down by topic, you must be a registered user of ChiroACCESS. The primary mission of ChiroACCESS is to disseminate accurate user-friendly information to practicing chiropractors, faculty and students of chiropractic in order to ensure the best possible patient care.

Please click on the following link in order to register at ChiroACCESS and view the full detail of this clinical review.

If you already have an account, you may log in at this time.



References

1. 

Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Review article. US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 1993; 269(20):2667-2672.



2. 

Bunnell WP. Selective screening for scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;(434):40-45.



3. 

Lonstein JE, Morrissy RT. Scoliosis school screening: is it of value? Orthopedics 1989; 12(12):1589-1593.



4. 

Yawn BP, Yawn RA, Hodge D, Kurland M, Shaughnessy WJ, Ilstrup D et al. A population-based study of school scoliosis screening. JAMA 1999; 282(15):1427-1432.



5. 

Kane WJ. Scoliosis prevalence: a call for a statement of terms. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977;(126):43-46.



6. 

Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, Kehl D, Cowie GH. Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 72(3):320-327.



7. 

Beauchamp M, Labelle H, Grimard G, Stanciu C, Poitras B, Dansereau J. Diurnal variation of Cobb angle measurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1993; 18(12):1581-1583.



8. 

Morin DM, Lonstein JE, Stovall M, Hacker DG, Luckyanov N, Land CE. Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the U.S. Scoliosis Cohort Study. Spine 2000; 25(16):2052-2063.



9. 

Reamy BV, Slakey JB. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: review and current concepts. Am Fam Physician 2001; 64(1):111-116.



10. 

Van Goethem J, Van Campenhout A, van den HL, Parizel PM. Scoliosis. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2007; 17(1):105-115.



11. 

Wright N. Imaging in scoliosis. Arch Dis Child 2000; 82(1):38-40.



12. 

Urbaniak JR, Schaefer WW, Stelling FH, III. Iliac apophyses. Prognostic value in idiopathic schliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976;(116):80-85.



13. 

Bunnell WP. Outcome of spinal screening. Spine 1993; 18(12):1572-1580.



14. 

Karachalios T, Roidis N, Papagelopoulos PJ, Karachalios GG. The efficacy of school screening for scoliosis. Orthopedics 2000; 23(4):386-391.



15. 

Cote P, Kreitz BG, Cassidy JD, Dzus AK, Martel J. A study of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Scoliometer and Adam's forward bend test. Spine 1998; 23(7):796-802.



16. 

Karachalios T, Sofianos J, Roidis N, Sapkas G, Korres D, Nikolopoulos K. Ten-year follow-up evaluation of a school screening program for scoliosis. Is the forward-bending test an accurate diagnostic criterion for the screening of scoliosis? Spine 1999; 24(22):2318-2324.



17. 

Laulund T, Sojbjerg JO, Horlyck E. Moire topography in school screening for structural scoliosis. Acta Othrop Scand 53, 765-768. 1982.